holding tank indicator vs discharge pump on 33 express

no restrictions

Active Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Galveston, tx
I have a 07 33 express.
the holding tank indicator show mid, I run the discharge pump which seems to be on but the indicator does not change. I had the dealer fix it about 5 month ago, at which time it was a pump problem.

I pumped out the holding tank last Saturday, but the indictor still shows mid.

has anybody had similar issues.
 

gulfcart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
Points
16
Location
Palm Harbor, FL
Are you sure it's discharging? I assume the '07s have the new style without the macerator. I had an issue with my '08. Pump ran but no discharge. They have what they call a "duck valve" on each side of the pump. If you turn the discharge pump on before you open the valve it inverts the valve which you will then need to replace. It's a pain. It's a lousy set up but they blame it on operator error but its really an engineering issue I beleive. I now tether the key to the valve so it can't happen.

You can get it to empty if you leave the discharge valve open and run at cruise speed. (Be sure you are in legal water) This gets it empty for an emergency.
 

Gman25

GreatGrady Captain
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
808
Reaction score
4
Points
18
Location
Bayshore, NY
I had a similar problem with the duck valve. I took the whole thing apart to look for a problem and discovered the valve was turned inside out. I corrected the valve,reinstalled it and its been good ever since.
 

gerrys

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
272
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
vero beach FL
Duckbill valve. Correct, if you run the pump with the discharge seacock closed, the valves will be sucked inside out. BUT, the first time you replace the valves you'll never forget again.
 

gulfcart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
Points
16
Location
Palm Harbor, FL
gerrys said:
Duckbill valve. Correct, if you run the pump with the discharge seacock closed, the valves will be sucked inside out. BUT, the first time you replace the valves you'll never forget again.

Ain't that the truth..It's a sh__y job!
 

wrobinson

GreatGrady Captain
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Charleston, SC
Make sure the cap for the pump out is closed tightly. If it is loose even a bit the discharge pump won't work.
 

Gman25

GreatGrady Captain
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
808
Reaction score
4
Points
18
Location
Bayshore, NY
gulfcart said:
gerrys said:
Duckbill valve. Correct, if you run the pump with the discharge seacock closed, the valves will be sucked inside out. BUT, the first time you replace the valves you'll never forget again.

Ain't that the truth..It's a sh__y job!

So very true..Thats why I havent had a problem since. :wink:
 

ksouza12

Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Boston, MA
Model
Express 330
I just made this mistake yesterday on my 01 330. Anyone have the link to what specific valve I need?
Also location of the valve and any tips would be greatly appreciated!
 

seasick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,529
Reaction score
1,420
Points
113
Location
NYC
There are two potential issues. One is that the pump is not pumping out and I have no idea if that is the case here. The second is that the level sensor is not working, I don't know what model the sender is but if it is a float type, it could be stuck. When you say that last Saturday you pumped out the tank, was that a dockside pumpout?. If that actually did pump out contents but the display didn't change, the sender itself or the display controller is the issue.
 

Mustang65fbk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2020
Messages
2,576
Reaction score
682
Points
113
Age
38
Location
Seattle area
Model
Seafarer
This thread is from 2008 and is 16 years old now at this point, of which I'm not even sure if the OP is still a member since it doesn't show when he was last on the GG forums here. Though it does appear that his latest posting was back in 2011. That, as well as every other member that posted on this thread, none of them have been back to the site in at least a year, some of which haven't been back on here since 2014-2015. I'd honestly just start another thread for the same topic and go from there.
 

seasick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,529
Reaction score
1,420
Points
113
Location
NYC
This thread is from 2008 and is 16 years old now at this point, of which I'm not even sure if the OP is still a member since it doesn't show when he was last on the GG forums here. Though it does appear that his latest posting was back in 2011. That, as well as every other member that posted on this thread, none of them have been back to the site in at least a year, some of which haven't been back on here since 2014-2015. I'd honestly just start another thread for the same topic and go from there.
I make that mistake often. Perhaps each message should have an 'originally poster on date' of some sort.
Some boards automatically lock threads after a period of inactivity. That could also be an option.