Underpowered? 208 Adventure

Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Coastal GA
I am looking to purchase a 208 Adventure,(one is a 1999 another is 1994), both boats are powered by a 2005 150 hp 4 stroke. Would this engine be too under powered for this boat when loaded and has bottom paint? Thanks for the help!
 

wahoo33417

GreatGrady Captain
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
1,233
Reaction score
240
Points
63
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
Model
Sailfish
We had a 1995 208 with a two-stroke 150 for ten years. Not underpowered for most of my use. Only time I really felt the need for more power was with four scuba divers and all our tanks and gear. For most of my use, a couple of guys fishing or the family snorkeling or diving, the 150 was great. I would cruise at 4,000 rpm and 30 mph, which was Grady's stated target for two-strokes.

I'll add that the 208 was a great boat. We did many crossings to the Bahamas and runs to the keys.

Rob
 

seasick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,531
Reaction score
1,420
Points
113
Location
NYC
Coastal Seminole said:
I am looking to purchase a 208 Adventure,(one is a 1999 another is 1994), both boats are powered by a 2005 150 hp 4 stroke. Would this engine be too under powered for this boat when loaded and has bottom paint? Thanks for the help!

208s are fine with 150 2 strokes as long as they don't have a hard top.
For a 4 stroke, the 150 may be on the underpowered side. One of the most common mistakes is selecting an engine that is on the low side of hp range. Since the 4 stroke weighs 100 pounds or so more than the 2 stroke, the ride will be equivalent to adding another passenger.
I have a 208 with a 150 2 stroke and it is plenty for me but if I load up with 4 passengers, the performance drop is noticeable. If I re-powered to a 4 stroke, I would go 175 or 200. Several years ago I spoke to a Grade rep about 4 strokes and he also advised a larger engine if i went to a 4 stroke.

By the way, in general the bottom paint isn't going to make that much difference but the number of passengers will.
 

CJBROWN

GreatGrady Captain
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
894
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Orange County, CA
Welcome to the forum! It's a fantastic information source and a great bunch of guys.

For ocean work the 150 is fine. I regularly have 4 on board and a kid or two, and it gets up on plane and cruises without issue. I do find that 44-4500rpm give better speed than the factory best cruise spec of 4200 for 27mph. I run a 15x15 prop for better bite and holeshot, so my speed at 4200 is about 25-26 depending on load. I prefer 28-30 for a cruise speed.

I have a PERMATRIM on my motor, nice option, and bennett tabs. Both work to improve performance substantially.

If I was going to do a lot of watersports on the lakes where I wanted more hole-shot and top end, then definately, a 200 would be desirable. Don't forget, it would burn more fuel too. I certainly would not want an old carbed 2-stroke, too much smoke, too much fuel. I'd take my f150 any day over one of those.

When I first got mine I looked into a 175 E-tec as I think that's the perfect engine for these boats, maybe even the 200 but it's more money and the 25more hp is just on the top end. But I passed because it was going to cost around five grand, give or take.

Another re-power option if you find one with an old style motor, would be a HPDI 200 take-off. They do come up for sale, anything with 5-600 hours or less would be a great candidate, and probably could be had for a good price. I've seen them for $5-$7,000. A low hour f150 is going to be in the $10K range.

I would take the '99 over a '94, although condition is everything. Still, newer is better. It's still a ten year old boat. With a '05 F150 you can't miss. What are they asking, what kind of trailer? Options?