Amen Brother.Watching the suffering in Ukraine puts the sacrifice of higher fuel prices in perspective.
Amen Brother.Watching the suffering in Ukraine puts the sacrifice of higher fuel prices in perspective.
Too funny Pat... Not a public schooled one... LOL.Not so funny thing we have research vessels sounding the ocean bottom 20 miles off the coast of Delaware and Maryland to locate future locations for wind turbines to generate electricity. I don’t think you could convince a 6th grader (not a public schooled one) that this is going to be cost effective without a massive dose of tax payer subsidies. Sorry I ain’t buying the facade. Time for a reality check on the time frame to switch to renewables etc. We’ll destroy the economy and the country while we allow others to destroy the environment processing fossil fuels less efficiently then we can.
Too funny Pat... Not a public schooled one... LOl
A recent sale of the rights for wind turbines off the coast of New Jersey went for more than 4 billion dollars. Energy companies must see this as a viable source of future energy to make that kind of investment. The federal government now has that $4 billion to invest in renewable energy sources without tapping the taxpayers. I share the concern of all Americans with the dramatic rise in gas prices and this concern should contribute to more research and development of renewable and alternative energy resources as well different oil sources.Fossil fuels though have been proven to be the most detrimental to the environment, contribute to global warming and most of all are finite. And on a selfish point of view, right now boats and ships can only be powered by three different means, fossil fuels, nuclear and wind. I am no sailer, I doubt if they have nuclear reactors available for 23’ center consoles so we need them to save US the gas.Not so funny thing we have research vessels sounding the ocean bottom 20 miles off the coast of Delaware and Maryland to locate future locations for wind turbines to generate electricity. I don’t think you could convince a 6th grader (not a public schooled one) that this is going to be cost effective without a massive dose of tax payer subsidies. Sorry I ain’t buying the facade. Time for a reality check on the time frame to switch to renewables etc. We’ll destroy the economy and the country while we allow others to destroy the environment processing fossil fuels less efficiently then we can.
Does it come with Homer Simpson to run it?I was really hoping these would be available by now:
View attachment 24915
It is an investment in or insurance for the future for sure. The problem is green energy at scale won't be viable, reliable or readily available for years. Do a google on the cape wind project off MA and see how long this has been going on. The problem is we need to produce enough fossil fuel-based energy (includes electricity) for the next 10-20 years while we in parallel develop and mature the technology and products that enable a rational transition. Some in govt believe they can imagine a green future and it will happen. This is just a pipe dream and it looks like we will learn it the hard way as we have incompetence at the helm of the US currently. The current trajectory may just destroy the marine and other industries. I wish the policies that our leaders enact would apply them first. How about a battery powered Marine One or Air Force One and lead by example?A recent sale of the rights for wind turbines off the coast of New Jersey went for more than 4 billion dollars. Energy companies must see this as a viable source of future energy to make that kind of investment. The federal government now has that $4 billion to invest in renewable energy sources without tapping the taxpayers. I share the concern of all Americans with the dramatic rise in gas prices and this concern should contribute to more research and development of renewable and alternative energy resources as well different oil sources.Fossil fuels though have been proven to be the most detrimental to the environment, contribute to global warming and most of all are finite. And on a selfish point of view, right now boats and ships can only be powered by three different means, fossil fuels, nuclear and wind. I am no sailer, I doubt if they have nuclear reactors available for 23’ center consoles so we need them to save US the gas.
More drilling permits have been granted under this administration than the last. Maybe the oil companies have once again taken advantage of a global situation to obtain record profits. Why aren’t the Saudi’s opening up the tap? Because why would they when they can get $100 a barrel now. In my opinion one of the biggest problems with American business and investors is that they think of the next quarter and not five or ten years down the road. Eisenhower passed the National Highway act in 1956. It has been estimated that it wasn’t completed until 1992. The Panama Canal took ten years to build. How much fuel did those two projects save? I receive my electric from Peco Electric. It is generated at Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. That technology was from the fifties and was constructed in the sixties and seventies. Why aren’t we updating atomic energy? What about higher CAFE standards on new cars? Maybe the oil lobby has something to say about it? As for battery powered airplanes and helicopters I think they are way, way off but a battery powered presidential limo and Secret Service vehicles could be done in quick time. If Americans could put a man on the Moon in ten years why can’t we try for energy independence and clean energy in a similar type of time frame?It is an investment in or insurance for the future for sure. The problem is green energy at scale won't be viable, reliable or readily available for years. Do a google on the cape wind project off MA and see how long this has been going on. The problem is we need to produce enough fossil fuel-based energy (includes electricity) for the next 10-20 years while we in parallel develop and mature the technology and products that enable a rational transition. Some in govt believe they can imagine a green future and it will happen. This is just a pipe dream and it looks like we will learn it the hard way as we have incompetence at the helm of the US currently. The current trajectory may just destroy the marine and other industries. I wish the policies that our leaders enact would apply them first. How about a battery powered Marine One or Air Force One and lead by example?
When you are the leader, the buck stops with you - period. Stop blaming other nations, past presidents and oil companies. A leader takes ownership and fixes the problem versus obfuscating the issue. Who would add a 15% tax on natural gas to the build back bill that was passed? - a fool. A real leader would call the fossil fuel industry leaders in and say "what do we have to do for you to have faith in us, make the big long term investments and start producing more energy asap?" Instead we have word salad, misinformation and double speak while the marine industry is on the verge of getting crushed.More drilling permits have been granted under this administration than the last. Maybe the oil companies have once again taken advantage of a global situation to obtain record profits. Why aren’t the Saudi’s opening up the tap? Because why would they when they can get $100 a barrel now. In my opinion one of the biggest problems with American business and investors is that they think of the next quarter and not five or ten years down the road. Eisenhower passed the National Highway act in 1956. It has been estimated that it wasn’t completed until 1992. The Panama Canal took ten years to build. How much fuel did those two projects save? I receive my electric from Peco Electric. It is generated at Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. That technology was from the fifties and was constructed in the sixties and seventies. Why aren’t we updating atomic energy? What about higher CAFE standards on new cars? Maybe the oil lobby has something to say about it? As for battery powered airplanes and helicopters I think they are way, way off but a battery powered presidential limo and Secret Service vehicles could be done in quick time. If Americans could put a man on the Moon in ten years why can’t we try for energy independence and clean energy in a similar type of time frame?
All as I know it's that a few years ago I was paying $2 a gallon for fuel with a different man in office and don't give me a president does not influence the price of fuel!!!A recent sale of the rights for wind turbines off the coast of New Jersey went for more than 4 billion dollars. Energy companies must see this as a viable source of future energy to make that kind of investment. The federal government now has that $4 billion to invest in renewable energy sources without tapping the taxpayers. I share the concern of all Americans with the dramatic rise in gas prices and this concern should contribute to more research and development of renewable and alternative energy resources as well different oil sources.Fossil fuels though have been proven to be the most detrimental to the environment, contribute to global warming and most of all are finite. And on a selfish point of view, right now boats and ships can only be powered by three different means, fossil fuels, nuclear and wind. I am no sailer, I doubt if they have nuclear reactors available for 23’ center consoles so we need them to save US the gas.
Get your head out of the sand! In one day of this high price they made up as you say the loss?Ok my friends we were in a pandemic nobody was driving, as things started to ease up the gas companies wanted to make up there loses. That's what this is all about, so please let's not make this into something it's not, especially on this site.
I totally agree and for the record high fuel prices don't impact me much.Well this has turned really fun… boating is a luxury pastime for most… far from a necessity… anyone that can’t afford the gas can sell their boat at record high prices quite quickly