- Joined
- Feb 28, 2005
- Messages
- 1,233
- Reaction score
- 240
- Points
- 63
- Location
- West Palm Beach, FL
- Model
- Sailfish
On each of my previous boats, I've carried an inexpensive, lightweight aluminum "get home" prop. Usually about the same size as the prop Grady put on the boat. I hadn't done that with the Sailfish yet, but wanted that done before going through the Big Bend area of FL this summer on the last leg of the Loop. I've heard tell of numerous unmarked rocks, especially around Homosassa, a place I very much want to see.
I've wanted to try a four blade prop and this was a relatively inexpensive way to do it.
I settled on a Solas Amita 4 because they're very inexpensive (cheap) as props go and they come pre-hubbed. The Solas online prop selector gave me 14.5" dia x 17 pitch for the Sailfish. I confirmed this with an email to solas.
Turns out, that isn't quite enough prop for the boat, at least as I had it loaded today. It was just me, half fuel, five rods and assorted tackle.
For comparison, my 16-year old, kinda rough shape Saltwater Series II, 15 1/4" x 19 pitch has a sweet spot of about 3500 rpm, getting 25-26 mph and 1.7 mpg. However, my boat tops out at 5400 rpm and 44mph. It follows the Yamaha/Grady test data until the upper rpms. A mystery to both me and the dealer.
My numbers for the Solas aren't completely fair because it was a bit choppy in the ocean. Then I ran in a narrow portion of the ICW with other boat traffic. I really couldn't take my eyes off the water or hands off the trim tabs long enough to dial in the most efficient engine trim for the props at that speed.
Ocean Running into a 2' chop:
Running Inside in narrow ICW:
A couple of thoughts. This is my first time running the props, so I didn't get the best from them yet. They may be a bit undersized, but they're light and will fit easily in an underberth compartment, so I'll keep them (I don't really have much of a choice!). They fit right onto the prop shaft with no additional washers or spacers.
From today's impression, I think the boat came on plane at a higher speed than my SS 3-blades. Surprising to me. With some time spent dialing in the sweet spots, I'm pretty sure these props could produce 1.7 mpg, even though they're a bit undersized. I saw 1.7 a couple of times, but it didn't hold it for long enough to count. If true, that makes these cheapo aluminum props yield the same mpg at a couple mph higher than my Yamaha props. But also turning about 1,000 more rpms. Setting aside the aluminum flex and slippage for a moment, which is better, theoretically?
(I'm not keeping these aluminum props on the boat after my Yamaha props get re-hubbed and some kind of tumbling polish to restore like new shine and to protect against surface rust once again with reasonable care? I have attempted to polish these 16-year old props by hand and I'm not impressed with the results.)
At 6,000 rpm, there was just a tad left. I bumped it up to 6100 rpms for a few seconds. There was very little to go after that, but I wasn't going to push it.
In my imaginationation, I thought I noticed a bit more maneuvering control around the dock, even from the undersized props.
I also thought these props were a bit quieter going into gear than my old props. Neither are SDS, so don't know why that would be be, but I sure thought so.
So that sums up my several hours experience with a pair of inexpensive four-blade, "get-home" props.
Oh, most of my time was spent drifting live goggle-eyes and they did great at that - no goggle-eyes got wound around the props
Rob
I've wanted to try a four blade prop and this was a relatively inexpensive way to do it.
I settled on a Solas Amita 4 because they're very inexpensive (cheap) as props go and they come pre-hubbed. The Solas online prop selector gave me 14.5" dia x 17 pitch for the Sailfish. I confirmed this with an email to solas.
Turns out, that isn't quite enough prop for the boat, at least as I had it loaded today. It was just me, half fuel, five rods and assorted tackle.
For comparison, my 16-year old, kinda rough shape Saltwater Series II, 15 1/4" x 19 pitch has a sweet spot of about 3500 rpm, getting 25-26 mph and 1.7 mpg. However, my boat tops out at 5400 rpm and 44mph. It follows the Yamaha/Grady test data until the upper rpms. A mystery to both me and the dealer.
My numbers for the Solas aren't completely fair because it was a bit choppy in the ocean. Then I ran in a narrow portion of the ICW with other boat traffic. I really couldn't take my eyes off the water or hands off the trim tabs long enough to dial in the most efficient engine trim for the props at that speed.
Ocean Running into a 2' chop:
- 4200 rpm 23 mph 1.5 mpg
- 4400 rpm 27 mph 1.6 mpg
- 4800 rpm 33 mph 1.5 mpg (with the wind)
Running Inside in narrow ICW:
- 4500 rpm 28 mph 1.6 mpg
- 5000 rpm 33 mph 1.5 mpg
- 6000 rpm 41 mph 1.0 mpg
A couple of thoughts. This is my first time running the props, so I didn't get the best from them yet. They may be a bit undersized, but they're light and will fit easily in an underberth compartment, so I'll keep them (I don't really have much of a choice!). They fit right onto the prop shaft with no additional washers or spacers.
From today's impression, I think the boat came on plane at a higher speed than my SS 3-blades. Surprising to me. With some time spent dialing in the sweet spots, I'm pretty sure these props could produce 1.7 mpg, even though they're a bit undersized. I saw 1.7 a couple of times, but it didn't hold it for long enough to count. If true, that makes these cheapo aluminum props yield the same mpg at a couple mph higher than my Yamaha props. But also turning about 1,000 more rpms. Setting aside the aluminum flex and slippage for a moment, which is better, theoretically?
(I'm not keeping these aluminum props on the boat after my Yamaha props get re-hubbed and some kind of tumbling polish to restore like new shine and to protect against surface rust once again with reasonable care? I have attempted to polish these 16-year old props by hand and I'm not impressed with the results.)
At 6,000 rpm, there was just a tad left. I bumped it up to 6100 rpms for a few seconds. There was very little to go after that, but I wasn't going to push it.
In my imaginationation, I thought I noticed a bit more maneuvering control around the dock, even from the undersized props.
I also thought these props were a bit quieter going into gear than my old props. Neither are SDS, so don't know why that would be be, but I sure thought so.
So that sums up my several hours experience with a pair of inexpensive four-blade, "get-home" props.
Oh, most of my time was spent drifting live goggle-eyes and they did great at that - no goggle-eyes got wound around the props
Rob
Last edited: