Salmon_Slayer
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2022
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 26
- Points
- 18
- Age
- 39
- Model
- Gulfstream
I've called around for all motors brands, the Suzuki's are minimum 8 months out unfortunately and was quoted $23K for a 250 installed. As of today I can either take over someone place on a yamaha 250 that just landed in the local warehouse or order a new honda with immediate delivery. I even called about Mercury 250 or 300 and they are min 12months out. I've owned the Arima for a long time, and sold my 2018 21' North River Seahawk after riding in a seafarer 228 in the ocean in hopes to find one. I'm aligning everything to be fishing by June so engine availability determines that. Prices for everything have skyrocketed. The boat you purchased was on my list last year and I was just not fast enough to buy it, this one I have a hold on seems like its in great shape, the scheduled survey will tell me everything I need to know. And yes Arima's suck in chop, but she is easy to fish from, cheap to maintain and nimble as heck! I will be using this boat to chase Tuna, I'll most likely moore the Arima where I target spring salmon off the columbia and take the Grady on ocean trips. I sold my North River for $63K so I'm stoked to find a hardtop Grady that will be refreshed as a replacement. Like I said above the only way I'll let go the Arima is to replace it with a sled, but I dont think I'll find a repowered sled for under $20K. At the end of the day yes I'll oddly have multiple boats (plus a drift boat) but I'm still way under $$ than any new boat that compares and with both being repowered I'm set for a long time and able to fish anything I want in the PNW! BTW I fish a lot with friends and family so its all well spent money to me.You should take a look at Suzuki outboards as they make a Suzuki 250 that you can typically find for less than $20k depending on where you live. I've even seen them advertised on Boat Trader or elsewhere around the $15k range, sometimes even slightly less than that. If I were ever to re-power I would go with a Suzuki because of their warranty, service, great reputation and most of all the price. The Yamaha is roughly $10k more and I'm not going to pay an extra $10k just for the name. Even at a buying price of $31k when you add the price of a new Yamaha outboard at $27k, that's already $58k. It sounds like you might be able to make a wash of transportation costs along with potentially selling your old motor but you'll still need a kicker motor, newer electronics at some point and possibly downriggers? Not exactly sure all of what you have compared to what you need but those are all going to cost more than a total of $2k as a Yamaha 9.9hp High Thrust is over $3,500. But again, it's your money and if that's really what you want to do and how much you want to spend then by all means go for it. I do like that your boat doesn't have bottom paint on it and that it comes with a brand new trailer. I looked at the pictures in the ad multiple times but it wasn't the boat for me at that price. The Arima was a decent boat for me but fishing in the Puget Sound can get a little choppy at times and you'll have 1'-2' chop which you'll just get pounded in with the Arima. It wasn't a bad boat for fishing solo or even with a couple of buddies and for only being a 21' boat it had a surprising amount of fishing space in it. It also did pretty well on fuel, even at WOT when you were cruising it still did pretty well.
That being said, those are about the only things I liked about the Arima as I thought the cabin was too small, the helm area wasn't really big enough for two larger people sitting in the captain's and passenger chairs. I hated the ride quality in the Arima and it would slap you around even with the tiniest bit of chop or wind. It was so light of a boat that the wind would push you around as would the current and after owning it for a couple of months I told myself I wanted something much different and much better as well as nicer. The Arima's have an almost cult-like following in the PNW, I think mostly because they're made in the Seattle area, but I don't understand why. I think they're so completely overrated and I'd never want to own another one again, and I owned two 21' Sea Rangers. They work great when the conditions are flat and calm but what boat doesn't perform perfectly in those conditions? I did the sea trial run for my 228 Seafarer and there was 1'-2' chop and started bending my knees to brace for the impact of the waves when we hit them but with the Grady, you just slice right through the waves and the water. It's a fantastic boat and the ride quality is night and day compared to the Arima. I think you'll likely take the Grady out a couple of times and realize how much better the ride quality is along with it being an easy boat to steer, manage and fish by yourself, and then you'll not use the Arima hardly ever again. The quality of the Grady is also hands down just so much better than the Arima with the fit and finish, the fiberglass, the stainless steel hardware and cleats, the no slip texturing and the thing I really appreciate about the Grady is the toe rails. I can't for the life of me figure out why boat manufacturers don't all use some sort of toe rail or something similar so that people aren't falling overboard. I remember the first time I looked at my boat and thought "Wow" this thing looks great, especially compared to the Arima. I'd say the Grady is probably an 8.5 or 9 out of 10 in regards to how nice it is with the fit, finish and quality of materials used. The Arima comparatively? Probably a 2 or 3? At best? My last Arima was a 2003 and it always looked faded, even when I washed, waxed and buffed it all out. It still looked faded, dirty and just felt like a cheaply made boat that was only meant for fishing. With the Grady you can go fishing, crabbing, shrimping, cruising, sail-gating or whatever you want to do with it.
Last edited: