I have to agree with Rich. On many of the past Gradys, especially the notched outboard models, Grady created a recipe for disaster by installing the aluminum corner trim around the notch in transom, instead of completely sealing floor to hull in this area. I have owned three Grady Whites and I'm currently replacing the transom on my 22' Seafarer. The wood was completely shot. I had to cut section of floor out in order to do a proper replacement of damaged transom wood. Absolutely no reason that this had to happen other than inferior design.
Cockpit floor panels covering tanks is another poorly designed area. Screwholes are not encapsulated, allowing water to seep around screws into wood. I completely stripped and repaired mine last year.
Don't fool yourselves. If you have an older Grady with the aluminum angle molding on notched transom, you most likely are getting moisture into your transom core. This moisture will wick throughout the complete transom wood eventually destroying it. Even if you attemp to thoroughly seal this molding, water gets under it where outboard is mounted.
Don't believe me, want to check yours. Take a cople of the screws out that hold the aluminm molding. Now take an ice pick and push it down through the screw hole. Unless your boat has been stored inside with very little use, many of you are going to find bad wood. How much is hard to determine.
Take a look at pics of my current transom project. This started as when I decided that I would replace my single engine with twins. When removing single engine I noticed transom had a slight bow out from boat. After pulling engine I started probing around and removed this aluminum molding. Well it kept going deeper and deeper, until I realized that the complete transom wood area was wet and much of it rotten.
I should have it completely rebuilt in a week or so, and can't wait to get back on the water. For the record, I love Gradys, and will probably always own one, but as far as items mentioned above, they definitly dropped the ball, bigtime.
richie rich said:
Wow, this has been a great discussion to read.....lots of good points from both sides of the wood issue, But since I'm literally knee deep in my bilge rebuilding all my stringers and bulkheads on my GW, I'd have to agree with the comments regarding execution when working with wood. It does give the best ride and its super strong when laminated properly, but GW did not go the extra mile to insure this. The wood is not encapsulated 100% all sides, and the GW guys even told me they relied on the type of wood to handle the moisture issue, thats why they didn't do it...not my words..theirs. They also continue to use polyester resin which is the least moisture resistant when compared to vinyl ester or epoxy. The cost in the resin is also scaled respectively as VE and epoxy are very expensive, but most mid to high end boats these days use VE below the waterline, and GW should follow suit.....their website says they still use PE because its proven to do well for them....based on what is written on this web site, it sounds like they should make the change, at least in the wet areas and around all the wood. You're not going to get a better ride with composites.....they're faster, stiffer and more fuel efficient but a GW ride is money.....if they went the full mile with resin and 100% encapsulation, we'd all be talking about fishing and cruising...not repairing our boats......just my perspective....