ocnslr said:Not sure I understand the basis of the complaints.
Grady White builds boats the way they want to, with wood.
If you don't like that, then I don't see the point of trying to get them to change their methods.
There are so many other boats with foam structural members, vacuum-bagging techniques, etc. You should be able to find something that meets your standards.
I will happily stick with what I have now.
Brian
gradyfish22 said:gregsnow, Egg Harbor is still alive, but they build very few boats, actually not sure they ahve put a boat out the door in a few months, but they are building the Davis line which they bought from Buddy Davis a few years back. Heard they are trying to burry that brand now too and Buddy has yet again started his own company.
As for Grady's, wood is a great building material and will never get my complaint. as for new technologies, they are not always the best. I've seen new core materials desintirate because air was present in manufacturing and the boat pounded a bit and it actually rattled the core apart into dust. New technologies bring about new unknown adverseeffects. Reducing weight which is what many new build techniques would do would worsen the ride of a Grady, going lighter then they are would be bad, you wan tthe weight. It will also increase the price of the boat, not only are most new technologies more expensive, they inviolve training of workers, that emans down time and money invested, new equipment to work with the new materials, and research to ensure the product going out the door is worthy of the Grady name, or any boat builder for that matter. There has to be a significant reason and lots of data to prove that using another material over wood is worth it. I've looked into many lay up types for the company I work for and changing to another material or lay up technique might make the boats lighter or go faster, but will increase the price and will lengthen the time to build the boats, which in our case was not worth it. Additionally it would only be needed for some models, adding even more to cost since there is a need for more workers, trained in either both types of build, or one or the other, as well as more space to handle the manufacturing and the materials. Wood has been sued for years, and will remain in boat building for more to come. For its weight and price, it is one of the strongest materials out there. Unless you want a plastic boat, be glad wood is used in certain parts of the boat. As for how the wood is sealed and such that is another topic and that is what worries most owners. Also, do owner's know how to properly maintain the wood structure in their boats as well as how to prevent problems down the road from proper maintenance?...that might be the problem. Maybe Grady needs to address known issues to new owner's and convey ways to prevent issues when you buy the boat. I'm sure they do not do so because then you would ask why am I buying this boat and why will this happen, it will make you second guess your choice, but in reality it would actually make them an even better boat. Most issues that boats enocounter are not from the way they are built or faulty materials, but from a lack of knowledge and proper maintenance.
gregsnow said:SoutheastFL said:BobP said:The only reason wood is still used today is the exact same reason 49 cent incandescent light bulbs are still used. They work and are cheap $$ relative to other technologies.
That is exactly right, the TRUE reason GW stays with wood stringers is because it puts more money in Eddie Smiths ( owner of GW ) pocket. And he's got his employees trained like robots to spout the corporate line everytime the question is asked, "we stick to the tried and true in boatbuilding". Forget the truth that it makes the owner more money.
Show some proof of your accusations. Until you can do that, hop on your jon boat and ride off into the sunset gracefully.
GS
SoutheastFL said:gregsnow said:SoutheastFL said:BobP said:The only reason wood is still used today is the exact same reason 49 cent incandescent light bulbs are still used. They work and are cheap $$ relative to other technologies.
That is exactly right, the TRUE reason GW stays with wood stringers is because it puts more money in Eddie Smiths ( owner of GW ) pocket. And he's got his employees trained like robots to spout the corporate line everytime the question is asked, "we stick to the tried and true in boatbuilding". Forget the truth that it makes the owner more money.
Show some proof of your accusations. Until you can do that, hop on your jon boat and ride off into the sunset gracefully.
GS
GW charges the same as top tier boats like Intrepid, SeeVee, and Yellowfin, and none of them have wood stringers. Good enough for you or are you a GW robot too ??
SoutheastFL said:GW charges the same as top tier boats like Intrepid, SeeVee, and Yellowfin, and none of them have wood stringers. Good enough for you or are you a GW robot too ??
gregsnow said:
GW charges the same as top tier boats like Intrepid, SeeVee, and Yellowfin, and none of them have wood stringers. Good enough for you or are you a GW robot too ??
gradyfish22 said:I guess Grady's aren't quality boats :roll: :?: ? What basis do you have for this... and I'm not sure who is determining that an Intrepid is better quality then a Grady, they are both top notch builders who build totally different style boats who tailer to totally different boaters and their needs.....there is no way you can compare the two boat brands, there are no similarities at all in what each brand builds as far as models and usage. I've ran both brands boats and both ran excellent, and both have their own situations where one is better then the other but anyone trying to decide between buying between the two brands is just confused and has no idea what he wants because they are not the same at all.